Norman Corwin
The Making of Lust for Life
|
In the early 1930s when silent movies were replaced by talkies, Hollywood had a sudden need for writers--or at least those who could string together a narrative. The major studios raided the Broadway and London theaters recruiting playwrights to adapt their own works or those of others.
In the
1940s film companies filled their writing departments with novelists and short
story writers, including Dashiell Hammet, Dorothy Parker, William Faulkner, and
F. Scott Fitzgerald. It is surprising that, in their search for talent, the
studios overlooked radio writers. After all, those who wrote for that slightly
older medium were able to write under pressure and turn out dialogue that was
clear, direct, and, above all, imaginative.
Corwin
was born in Massachusetts in 1910. As a teenager, he worked on local
newspapers, then joined one of the radio stations that were springing up around
the country. Soon Corwin found himself a writer-director for CBS radio in New
York City.
Corwin's outlook may have been too political for Hollywood, and with the decline
of radio, he turned to essay writing. He focused on contemporary culture and
current affairs and approached his subjects with a Stevensonian "Let's talk
sense to the American people" bluntness. |
|
AL: |
In his book on Vincente Minnelli, Stephen Harvey writes that MGM's efforts to
film Lust for Life were jinxed. The studio had owned the rights to Irving
Stone's novel since the 1940s and had shelved several screenplays, including
one by Dalton Trumbo and another by Stone. How did you get involved? |
NC: |
Stone had an arrangement with another studio to shoot
Lust for Life as soon as Metro's option expired. Metro was worried. They
were going to lose their option in a month or two. That was why they came to
me, knowing I was accustomed to pressure and that I could get a job done on
time, and I did. |
AL: | John Houseman was assigned as
the in-house producer. |
NC: |
Yes. John called me from
Metro and asked how I'd like to do the script. I asked him to send me the
book which I was not familiar with. John asked me if I wanted to see the
prior screenplays, and I said, no thank you, I'll just read the book. |
AL: | Your screenplay departed from the Stone novel. |
NC: |
While I thought that Irving Stone did a good job of
introducing Vincent Van Gogh to the American public, the book was somehow
not mature for a screenplay. So I decided to read Van Gogh's letters, and,
in doing so, I was aware that no one could write about Van Gogh better than
he wrote about himself. I persuaded John that the picture should be based on
Van Gogh's letters, and he agreed. |
AL: | Stephen Harvey refers to Van
Gogh's letters to his brother and supporter, Theo.
|
NC: |
The record was more plentiful in the case of Lust for Life than it usually is in any biographical drama. I was guided not only by the letters Vincent wrote but also by Paul Gauguin's journal of his days with Vincent at Arles and by contemporary records. That's why I think that the movie is truer than any other film made about a painter.
|
AL: | Vincente Minnelli was the director. Did he follow your
script? |
NC: |
There are directors who would have taken over. Minnelli was respectful of the script. He approached it almost as a writer would to get the essence, and be true to the material, true to history, true to the letters, true to what I had written.
|
AL: |
How would you describe Minnelli's directing technique? |
NC: |
He was workmanlike. Minnelli did not spend an outlandish time rehearsing. I felt he was measured in his work. He got to the bottom of things.
|
AL: | Kirk Douglas played Van Gogh. Anthony Quinn played Paul
Gauguin, his friend and rival. On the set, Minnelli had two healthy egos to
contend with. |
NC: |
That's right. They worked well together, and I give Minnelli credit for that. He had authority and handled it successfully. They respected him. It was a production without the usual jealousies and without envy. I don't know how Kirk Douglas feels about it today, but I certainly believe it was the best role of his career. His performance was moving. It was a different Kirk Douglas.
|
AL: | How did Anthony Quinn come to
play Gauguin? |
NC: |
Happily, I played a role in
the casting. I told John Houseman I thought Anthony Quinn would make a good
Gauguin. John agreed. So I called Tony, and he said, "Send me the script."
After he read it, Tony said he thought he'd pass. He said, "The role is so
small compared to Van Gogh." I said, "Come on. You're not weighing some
ham--this is an important role." Tony went along, and, as work progressed,
warmed up to the role. |
AL: | The rest of the cast were
not well-known.
|
NC: |
Much of the movie was shot
on location. I was only on the set in Hollywood. To save time and money,
Houseman recruited actors abroad. Theo was played by James Donald, a British
actor. |
AL: |
What material did you draw from Vincent's
letters to his brother Theo?
|
NC: |
Theo worked for the art dealer Goupil in Paris. At one point, Theo wrote Vincent that a dealer said, "Tell your brother that he paints too fast." Vincent wrote back, "Tell your friend that he looks too fast." I saved that exchange for a scene between Van Gogh and Gauguin who was patently jealous of his friend's output. Van Gogh would go out in all kinds of weather and would set up a wind defying easel and paint outdoors. Van Gogh turned out a canvas a day for a long time. Gauguin just sat in that "yellow house" in Arles which he shared with Vincent and painted.
|
AL: |
Dore Schary had taken control of MGM from Louis
Mayer. Did the movie reflect Schary's own progressive views?
|
NC: |
Well, in terms of the art world, the film could be considered a progressive movie. Van Gogh was a radical. He certainly was not a tranquil personality. He was in everybody's hair, but I don't think the progressivism of Schary was reflected by that picture.
|
AL: |
Van Gogh's life was tempestuous, culminating in self-mutilation and madness.
Were there many problems with the Hollywood censors? |
NC: |
No, their only objection involved a quarrel between Gauguin and Van Gogh in which Vincent accused his friend of sitting on his behind--instead of painting. The Production Board objected to the word "behind."
|